Websites using Scholasticahq
Total websites using Scholasticahq is 21
Okay, let s break down Scholastica, covering its overview, revenue aspects (where possible, as it s often private), alternatives, pricing structure, and customer care.
Overview of Scholastica
Scholastica is a technology platform and services provider aimed at improving academic journal publishing. It offers a suite of tools to support various stages of the publishing process, from submission and peer review to production and hosting. Its core mission is to make publishing more efficient, transparent, and sustainable for academic journals, particularly those run by scholars and societies.
Key Features and Services:
- Peer Review Management: A central hub for handling submissions, assigning reviewers, managing communications, and tracking progress. Often includes features for blinded review.
- Open Access Hosting: Provides hosting for journals and the articles they publish, emphasizing open access principles.
- Production Services: Can include copyediting, typesetting, and other services to prepare articles for publication.
- Journal Website Design: Help journals create and maintain professional-looking websites.
- Discovery and Indexing: Works to ensure journals are discoverable through indexing services like DOAJ, Google Scholar, etc.
- Analytics and Reporting: Provides data on submissions, peer review times, article usage, and other key metrics.
- OA Journal Funding Solutions: Offers tools and services to help journals manage and track Open Access (OA) funding and APC (Article Processing Charge) payments.
- Scholastica Open Access (OA) Publishing System: A more comprehensive solution allowing journals to publish open access articles directly through the platform.
Revenue and Funding (Information is Limited):
- Scholastica is a privately held company. Specific revenue figures are generally not publicly available.
- Their revenue model is based on a combination of subscription fees for their software platform and fees for their production services.
- They have likely received some funding from grants or investment to support their development and growth.
Pricing:
Scholastica s pricing structure typically depends on the services a journal needs and the size of the journal (e.g., number of submissions, number of articles published). They generally offer tiered pricing, with different plans offering different levels of features and support.
- Peer Review System: Often priced on a per-journal or per-year basis, with different tiers based on the number of submissions a journal receives. They may offer a free trial or a limited free version.
- Open Access Hosting: Pricing depends on storage needs, bandwidth, and other factors.
- Production Services: Typically priced per article or per service (e.g., copyediting, typesetting).
- OA Journal Funding Solutions: Pricing varies based on complexity and integration needs.
Important Note: To get accurate and up-to-date pricing information, you should visit Scholastica s website and request a quote or contact their sales team directly.
Alternatives to Scholastica:
Here are some alternative platforms and services that offer similar functionality to Scholastica:
- Open Journal Systems (OJS): A free, open-source platform for managing the entire journal publishing workflow. It s widely used and highly customizable, but requires technical expertise to set up and maintain.
- Editorial Manager (Aries Systems): A more established and enterprise-level peer review system, often used by larger publishers. It s feature-rich but can be more expensive than Scholastica.
- eJournalPress: Another commercial peer review and publishing platform.
- Janeway: An open-source publishing platform, often used by university presses and academic institutions. It offers support for peer review, production, and open access publishing.
- Penelope: A newer open-source submission and peer review system focused on simplicity and usability.
- PubPub: An open-source, collaborative publishing platform developed by the Knowledge Futures Group. It s designed for both journals and books.
- OASys (from Ubiquity Press): another OA focused publishing platform.
- Atypon Literatum: More of a full-fledged publishing platform used by larger publishers (think Elsevier, Wiley). It s not really a direct alternative for small scholar-led journals.
The best alternative depends on the specific needs and resources of the journal or publisher. Consider factors like budget, technical expertise, the desired level of customization, and the importance of open access.
Customer Care/Support:
Scholastica generally provides customer support through the following channels:
- Email Support: This is usually the primary method of contact.
- Help Center/Knowledge Base: They typically have a collection of articles and guides to help users troubleshoot problems and learn how to use the platform.
- Phone Support: May be available, especially for higher-tier plans. Check their website for availability.
- Live Chat: May be available during business hours. Check their website.
- Onboarding and Training: They may offer onboarding sessions or training materials to help new users get started.
- Community Forums/Discussion Groups: Less common, but some platforms have forums where users can ask questions and share tips.
- Account Manager: For larger clients, they may assign a dedicated account manager to provide personalized support.
Key Considerations When Evaluating Scholastica or its Alternatives:
- Ease of Use: How user-friendly is the platform for editors, reviewers, and authors?
- Features: Does it offer the features you need for your publishing workflow?
- Customization: Can you customize the platform to meet your specific requirements?
- Integration: Does it integrate with other tools you use, such as Crossref, ORCID, and indexing services?
- Cost: Is the pricing affordable for your budget?
- Support: Does the vendor provide adequate customer support?
- Open Access Support: Does the platform make it easy to publish open access and comply with relevant policies?
- Scalability: Can the platform handle your journal s growth in the future?
- Data Security and Privacy: Does the vendor have appropriate security measures in place to protect your data?
I hope this comprehensive overview is helpful! Let me know if you have any other questions.
Download free leads for websites using Scholasticahq
Website | Traffic | Tech Spend | Contacts | Social |
---|---|---|---|---|
ncmedicaljournal.com | high | $110-$270 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
findingspress.org | medium | $130-$320 | - | ![]() ![]() |
ajsonline.org | medium | $110-$280 | - | ![]() ![]() |
joghr.org | medium | $120-$300 | - | - |
houstonlawreview.org | high | $120-$290 | - | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
msmaonline.com | high | $80-$210 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
floridalawreview.com | high | $30-$80 | - | - |
albanylawreview.org | medium | $110-$280 | - | - |
dentist.ie | high | $170-$440 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
culturalanalytics.org | medium | $180-$450 | - | ![]() |
pacja.org.au | high | $110-$270 | - | - |
21 websites using CMS and Scholasticahq. Download full list of 21 customers and clients who use Scholasticahq.
Use this data and enrich with any of the email finders and start sending cold emails to get targetted leads. Any customers who are already using a similar technology are sure shot customers who just need a better option.