Websites using Gijgo

Okay, let s break down Gijgo, covering its overview, revenue (as much as is publicly available), alternatives, pricing, and customer care.

Overview

• What it is: Gijgo (previously known as PHP Grid) is a suite of free and open-source JavaScript UI libraries for building web applications. It focuses on providing common UI components (widgets) like grids/data tables, tree views, date pickers, dialogs, and other input controls.
• Key Features:
  • Wide Range of UI Components: Offers a variety of pre-built, customizable widgets.
  • Open Source: The code is freely available and can be modified to suit specific needs.
  • Lightweight: Designed to be relatively lightweight and performant compared to larger UI frameworks.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility: Aims to be compatible with major modern web browsers.
  • Ease of Use: Gijgo emphasizes simplicity and ease of integration into web projects.

Revenue

• No Publicly Available Revenue Information: Gijgo is primarily distributed as a free and open-source project. It doesn t appear to have a traditional revenue model like commercial software.
• Potential Revenue Streams (Speculation):
  • Donations: Open-source projects sometimes rely on donations from users or companies who find the library valuable. I haven t seen explicit donation requests prominently displayed, but it s a possibility.
  • Commercial Support/Consulting: The developers could offer commercial support, training, or consulting services around using and customizing Gijgo, but this is not actively advertised.
  • Custom Development: They could offer custom development services to build specific widgets or features for clients, but this is again not prominently featured.
  • Sponsorships: Companies might sponsor the project in exchange for recognition or feature prioritization.

Alternatives

Gijgo competes with a wide range of JavaScript UI libraries and frameworks. Here are some notable alternatives, categorized by their scope:

• Full-Featured UI Frameworks:
  • React (with UI libraries): React itself is a UI library, not a framework, but it s often used with component libraries like Material UI, Ant Design, Chakra UI, or Semantic UI React. React offers a component-based architecture, virtual DOM, and a large ecosystem.
  • Angular (with Angular Material or other libraries): A comprehensive framework from Google, providing structure, data binding, and a component-based approach. Angular Material is a popular UI component library for Angular.
  • Vue.js (with Vuetify, Element Plus, or Quasar): A progressive framework, easy to learn and integrate, with a component-based architecture. Vuetify, Element Plus, and Quasar are popular component libraries for Vue.
  • Svelte (with Svelte Material UI or other libraries): A compiler that transforms components into highly efficient vanilla JavaScript at build time.
• JavaScript UI Libraries:
  • jQuery UI: A legacy library providing widgets, effects, and utilities. Still used in some projects, but generally considered less modern than other options.
  • Bootstrap: A popular CSS framework that also includes some JavaScript components (like modals, dropdowns, and carousels).
  • Semantic UI: A framework that uses human-friendly HTML.
  • PrimeReact, PrimeVue, PrimeNG: A popular suite of UI components for React, Vue, and Angular respectively. Offers a wide range of components with themes and customization options.
  • Kendo UI: A commercial UI library (with a free trial) that provides a comprehensive set of widgets for jQuery, Angular, React, and Vue. It includes grids, charts, and other advanced components.
  • DHTMLX: Another commercial UI library with similar capabilities to Kendo UI.
  • Webix: A JavaScript UI library focused on data-rich applications.
  • jQWidgets: A JavaScript UI framework for building responsive web applications.
• Data Grid Libraries:
  • ag-Grid: A powerful and feature-rich data grid, available in both free (Community) and commercial (Enterprise) versions.
  • Handsontable: A JavaScript grid component that resembles a spreadsheet.
  • DataTables: A jQuery plugin for creating interactive tables.

When to Choose Gijgo vs. Alternatives:

• Choose Gijgo if:
  • You need a set of simple, lightweight UI components.
  • You want an open-source solution with no licensing costs.
  • You are comfortable working with JavaScript and basic HTML/CSS.
  • You have simple requirements and don t need the complexity of a full-featured framework.
• Choose Alternatives if:
  • You need a more comprehensive UI framework (React, Angular, Vue).
  • You need more advanced UI components (e.g., complex data grids, charts).
  • You need commercial support and guarantees.
  • You prefer a specific programming paradigm (e.g., component-based architecture).

Pricing

• Free and Open Source: Gijgo is free to use under the MIT License. This means you can use it for personal or commercial projects without paying any fees.

Customer Care/Support

• Community Support: Since it s open-source, support is primarily community-driven. The primary sources of support are likely:
  • Documentation: The official Gijgo documentation.
  • GitHub Repository: The Gijgo GitHub repository, where you can report issues, submit pull requests, and ask questions (although response times may vary).
  • Online Forums/Communities: General web development forums like Stack Overflow or Reddit (searching for Gijgo + your problem).
• No Guaranteed Support: There s no guarantee of official support or response times. You rely on the goodwill of the developers and the community.
• Possible Paid Support (Hypothetical): As mentioned earlier, while not actively advertised, it s possible to inquire about paid support, custom development, or consulting services directly from the developers, but this is not a formal offering.
• Consider alternatives with official support: If official support and response times are important, a commercial library like Kendo UI or ag-Grid Enterprise would be a better fit.

In summary, Gijgo is a valuable option for developers seeking a free and lightweight set of UI components, but it relies on community support and doesn t offer the same level of guarantees as commercial alternatives. Choose it if its strengths align with your project s needs and resources.