C LIENTSBEE


Websites using Cord



Total websites using Cord is 132

Collaboration

Okay, let s break down CORD (formerly known as Labelbox Annotate) covering its overview, revenue (although precise figures are often hard to get for private companies), alternatives, pricing considerations, and customer care.

Overview of CORD.AI (Formerly Labelbox Annotate)

  • What is it? CORD.AI is a platform focused on AI-powered data annotation and active learning. It helps companies create high-quality training data for computer vision models (and, increasingly, for other types of AI models). It is an end-to-end platform.

  • Core Functionality:

    • Data Labeling/Annotation: Provides tools and workflows for labeling images, videos, and 3D data. Supports various annotation types like bounding boxes, polygons, semantic segmentation, key points, and more.
    • Active Learning: Helps users identify the most valuable data points to label, improving model accuracy more efficiently. This is a key differentiator.
    • Collaboration: Enables teams to work together on labeling projects, with features for assigning tasks, reviewing annotations, and tracking progress.
    • Data Management: Offers features for organizing, storing, and managing labeled data.
    • Integration: Connects with popular machine learning frameworks (e.g., TensorFlow, PyTorch) and cloud storage providers (e.g., AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage).
    • SDK/API: Provides programmatic access to the platform for automation and integration with custom workflows.
    • Workflow Automation: Helps automate data annotation and review pipelines.
  • Target Audience: Companies building computer vision models, including those in industries like:

    • Autonomous Vehicles
    • Robotics
    • Healthcare
    • Retail
    • Manufacturing
    • Agriculture
    • Security/Surveillance
  • Key Differentiators:

    • Strong focus on active learning to improve annotation efficiency.
    • Robust video annotation capabilities.
    • Emphasis on high-quality data annotation and data-centric AI.
    • End to end platform

Revenue (Estimates and Considerations)

  • Private Company: CORD.AI is a private company. Therefore, publicly available revenue figures are limited.

  • Funding: CORD.AI has raised substantial venture capital funding. This suggests they are experiencing growth and are investing heavily in product development and sales/marketing. A large funding round often implies a revenue target that investors are expecting.

  • Subscription Model: Given the nature of the platform, it is highly likely that CORD.AI primarily uses a subscription-based revenue model. This means customers pay recurring fees (monthly or annually) for access to the platform and its features. The subscription tier would depend on factors like:

    • Number of users
    • Volume of data labeled
    • Features used (e.g., active learning)
    • Support level
  • Potential Revenue Drivers:

    • Growing demand for high-quality training data for AI models.
    • Adoption of active learning techniques to improve annotation efficiency.
    • Expansion into new industries and use cases.
    • Increased adoption of video and 3D data annotation.

Alternatives to CORD.AI

The data annotation market is quite competitive. Here are some notable alternatives to consider:

  • Scale AI: A well-established player, offering a wide range of annotation services and a platform.
  • SuperAnnotate: Focuses on computer vision annotation, with strong features for team collaboration and quality control.
  • Dataloop: A platform for managing and annotating data, with a focus on AI model development.
  • V7 Labs (Darwin): Offers an end-to-end platform for computer vision, including annotation, model training, and deployment.
  • Label Studio: An open-source data labeling tool that is highly customizable. A good option for smaller projects or teams with technical expertise.
  • Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth: A managed data labeling service from AWS, integrated with the AWS ecosystem.
  • Google Cloud AI Platform Data Labeling Service: Similar to Amazon s offering, integrated with Google Cloud.
  • Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Data Labeling: Microsoft s offering for data labeling within the Azure ecosystem.
  • Playment: Another data labeling platform, focusing on providing high-quality annotations.
  • Hive Data: Offers managed data labeling services and a platform.

Factors to Consider When Choosing an Alternative:

  • Specific Annotation Needs: Does the platform support the types of data and annotation tasks you require (e.g., video, 3D, specific object types)?
  • Team Size and Collaboration: Does the platform offer robust collaboration features for your team?
  • Integration: Does the platform integrate with your existing machine learning infrastructure and workflows?
  • Active Learning Capabilities: How important is active learning to your workflow?
  • Pricing: Compare pricing models and estimate costs based on your expected usage.
  • Scalability: Can the platform handle your data volume and team size as you grow?
  • Support and Documentation: How good is the documentation and support offered by the vendor?
  • Ease of Use: Is the platform user-friendly for your annotators?
  • Customization: How customizable is the platform? Does it allow for custom workflows or tools?

Pricing Details

  • No Public Pricing: CORD.AI does not publicly list its pricing. You typically need to contact them for a quote.

  • Likely Pricing Factors: Pricing will likely be based on a combination of factors, including:

    • Number of Users: More users will likely increase the cost.
    • Data Volume: The amount of data you label per month or year will be a significant factor.
    • Features Used: Access to advanced features like active learning, workflow automation, or custom integrations may increase the price.
    • Support Level: Higher levels of support (e.g., dedicated account manager, faster response times) may cost more.
    • Subscription Term: Longer subscription terms (e.g., annual) may offer discounted pricing.
  • How to Get a Quote: The best way to get accurate pricing information is to:

    1. Visit the CORD.AI website.
    2. Request a demo or contact their sales team.
    3. Provide them with details about your project, data volume, team size, and specific requirements.
    4. Ask for a customized quote.
  • Considerations for Budgeting:

    • Factor in potential overages: If you exceed your data volume limits, you may incur additional charges.
    • Estimate annotation time: Consider the time it will take to label your data and the cost of annotator time (whether you use internal resources or outsource).
    • Compare against alternatives: Get quotes from multiple vendors to compare pricing.
    • Evaluate the ROI: Consider the potential return on investment from using a data annotation platform (e.g., improved model accuracy, faster development time).

Customer Care Details

  • Support Channels: CORD.AI likely offers various support channels, including:

    • Email Support: A standard channel for submitting support requests.
    • Help Center/Documentation: A repository of articles, tutorials, and FAQs to help users troubleshoot issues and learn about the platform.
    • Chat Support: Live chat for faster assistance.
    • Phone Support: May be available for higher-tier customers.
    • Dedicated Account Manager: May be provided for enterprise customers.
    • Community Forums: A platform for users to ask questions and share knowledge.
  • Evaluating Customer Care:

    • Response Time: How quickly do they respond to support requests?
    • Resolution Time: How long does it take them to resolve issues?
    • Knowledge and Expertise: How knowledgeable are their support staff?
    • Proactive Support: Do they offer proactive guidance and support to help you succeed?
    • User Reviews: Look for online reviews and testimonials to get a sense of their customer service quality.
    • Training and Onboarding: Do they provide training and onboarding resources to help you get started with the platform?

Key Takeaways

  • CORD.AI (formerly Labelbox Annotate) is a strong player in the data annotation and active learning space, particularly for computer vision.
  • They offer a comprehensive platform with features for annotation, collaboration, data management, and integration.
  • Pricing is not publicly available and requires contacting their sales team.
  • Consider your specific annotation needs, team size, budget, and integration requirements when evaluating alternatives.
  • Evaluate customer care options and look for a provider that offers responsive and knowledgeable support.

I hope this comprehensive overview is helpful! Let me know if you have any other questions.





Download free leads for websites using Cord


Website Traffic Tech Spend Contacts Social
richmond.com high $2520-$6310 - -
omaha.com medium $2530-$6330 - -
tucson.com high $2560-$6400 -
columbustelegram.com high $2550-$6390 - -
tulsaworld.com high $2650-$6620 - -
journalstar.com medium $2610-$6520 - -
nwitimes.com high $2560-$6390 -
roanoke.com medium $2550-$6370 - -
billingsgazette.com medium $2520-$6300 - -
newsvirginian.com medium $2610-$6530 - -
journalnow.com high $2560-$6400 - -
trib.com high $2660-$6660 - -
pressofatlanticcity.com medium $2560-$6410 - -
missoulian.com high $2580-$6450 - -
greensboro.com high $2590-$6470 - -
pantagraph.com high $2560-$6400 - -
nonpareilonline.com medium $2560-$6410 - -
azstarnet.com medium $2470-$6180 -
napavalleyregister.com high $2550-$6390 - -
siouxcityjournal.com high $2640-$6610 - -
fredericksburg.com high $2560-$6410 - -
bismarcktribune.com medium $2560-$6410 - -
lacrossetribune.com medium $2580-$6440 - -
wacotrib.com high $2550-$6390 - -
helenair.com high $2640-$6610 - -
wcfcourier.com high $2680-$6700 -
timesdispatch.com medium $2670-$6690 - -
oanow.com medium $2620-$6550 -
herald-review.com medium $2560-$6410 - -
theeagle.com high $2580-$6460 - -
406mtsports.com medium $2450-$6130 - -
poststar.com high $2560-$6390 - -
kenoshanews.com medium $2670-$6670 - -
auburnpub.com medium $2520-$6310 - -
heraldcourier.com medium $2580-$6460 - -
cumberlink.com high $2560-$6410 - -
qconline.com high $2580-$6450 - -
thetandd.com high $2670-$6670 - -
gazettetimes.com high $2560-$6410 - -
wiscnews.com high $2560-$6400 - -
theindependent.com high $2570-$6420 - -
globegazette.com high $2560-$6410 - -
dothaneagle.com medium $2580-$6460 -
dbrnews.com medium $2560-$6400 - -
starherald.com high $2690-$6730 - -
elkodaily.com medium $2620-$6550 - -
kearneyhub.com high $2350-$5870 - -
winonadailynews.com medium $2640-$6610 - -
jg-tc.com medium $2560-$6410 -
news-record.com medium $2470-$6170 - -
agupdate.com high $2390-$5990 - -
fremonttribune.com high $2560-$6390 - -
godanriver.com high $2460-$6150 - -
alasco.de medium $210-$530 -
alasco.rocks high $230-$570 -
martinsvillebulletin.com high $2450-$6140 - -
independenttribune.com high $2580-$6440 - -
lee.net medium $2360-$5910 - -
morganton.com medium $2590-$6480 - -
statesville.com medium $2430-$6080 - -
promptemr.com medium $250-$620
everflow.io medium $130-$320 -
muscatinejournal.com high $2450-$6130 - -
qualipet.ch medium $100-$260
feastmagazine.com medium $2410-$6020 -
yorknewstimes.com medium $2480-$6200 - -
raptormaps.com high $490-$1220 -
beatricedailysun.com high $2460-$6160 -
firi.com high $130-$320 -
badgerextra.com medium $2430-$6080 - -
mcdowellnews.com high $2470-$6170 - -
swvatoday.com medium $2480-$6190 - -
tricities.com medium $2490-$6230 - -
balzac-paris.com high $320-$790 -
balzac-paris.fr medium $320-$790 -
lakegenevanews.net high $2470-$6170 - -
basepaint.xyz medium $840-$2090 - -
bhmginc.com medium $2380-$5950 - -
mooresvilletribune.com high $2440-$6090 - -
atlanticcityweekly.com high $2500-$6250 - -
buffalo.com medium $2410-$6030 - -
buffalonews.com medium $2480-$6190 - -
buffnews.com high $2490-$6230 - -
greatlife.se high $130-$340
casperstartribune.net medium $2500-$6250 - -
billingsgazette.net medium $2480-$6210 - -
huskerextra.com medium $2460-$6150 - -
laduenews.com medium $2440-$6090 -
stlhighschoolsports.com medium $2480-$6190 -
stltoday.com high $2450-$6140 -
teamwalnut.com high $300-$760 -
telraam-api.net medium $350-$890 - -
lexch.com medium $2490-$6220 - -
thisistucson.com high $2520-$6310 -
codello.de high $170-$420
thetimesonline.com high $2500-$6260 - -
inrich.com high $2520-$6310 - -
thefranklinnewspost.com medium $2510-$6270 - -
leetemplates.com high $2480-$6200 -
logixboard.com high $200-$500 -



Download full list of 132 customers and clients who use Cord. 132 customers using Collaboration and Cord.